Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starbattle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Starbattle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. No notability shown for this not-yet-released video game whose creator is a redlink. The article's creator matches the name of that company. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 20:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Violation of WP:CRYSTAL. It would've if there were references, it would be okay, but there aren't. --Meldshal [T] {C} 20:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 20:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable independent game, still under development, and no sources. MrKIA11 (talk) 20:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Is still under developement but is notable per the links and refs.(At least it actually exist) Gears of War 2 21:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pardon me, but I don't see how any of those references make the game notable. None of these sources are secondary. Just because something exists doesn't mean it is worthy of an encyclopedia article. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 21:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh well I guess thats just my inexperience kicking in. Gears of War 2 23:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pardon me, but I don't see how any of those references make the game notable. None of these sources are secondary. Just because something exists doesn't mean it is worthy of an encyclopedia article. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 21:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It might become notable after release; but unless any secondary references are given, it isn't. Bart133 (t) (c) 21:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable game with no sources that is still in development. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 21:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — I also endorsed the prod. If there are no verifiable, third-party sources establishing any notability, then this article fails WP:CBALL as the nom claims. MuZemike (talk) 23:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note — This is a contested prod. In addition, the article was created by User:ChirpingCricketGames, which is a WP:COI; this user was indefinitely blocked two minutes after the prod was posted. MuZemike (talk) 22:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed the user link above (was "Editing User:"). Nifboy (talk) 00:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not currently notable, though it may be in future. Natcong (talk) 22:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a quick stub to drum up interest, crystalballery and advertising. I can find no reliable secondary sources to satisfy notability. It may become notable if it's released, however the game's site has attracted two message-board posts in the past few months, it's totally below the radar at the minute. Someoneanother 22:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The official site has a greyed-out link to its press page, which I think says it all. Nifboy (talk) 00:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per others. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 03:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per others. JBsupreme (talk) 06:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.