Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars galaxy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Interesting article, shame it has to be deleted :( Ron Ritzman (talk) 20:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars galaxy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks real-wold notability as it is a derivative article of a work of fiction with no real-world coverage and written with an in-universe perspective. It doesn't have in-line references and also doesn't have reliable third-party sources. This article is mostly an indiscriminate collection of information and I believe that it doesn't meet the criteria of appropriate topics for lists and notability, being more in line with a fansite. It is my opinion that it meets the criteria of reasons for deletion, being a redundant content fork. Jfgslo (talk) 16:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the reasons given. Bob A (talk) 18:31, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence that is a notable concept in it own right. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Normally, I would say to ship this over to "Wookiepedia", the Star Wars entertainment wiki, but it seems to be a reasonable means of navigating the many articles we seem to have about the various elements of the Star Wars franchise. I think it's fair to say that most of the Star Wars planets do not actually get real world coverage, but those articles should be nominated individually or in groups. If this is redundant to a better outline of the galaxy from which all those Star Wars paperbacks come, than it should be redirected or merged to that. Mandsford 21:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete I can see this possibly being reworked into something worth keeping, though what it is it could be worked into is beyond me right now. The lists cover all the planets, vehicles, characters, etc. Personally, I'd prefer the article be called World of Star Wars or something, but that's just me. Harry Blue5 (talk) 18:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —Jfgslo (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Jfgslo (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Jfgslo (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: appears to be a WP:CONTENTFORK of what's already in the main series article. A mishmash of concepts that are at best redundant to other better articles, and in most other cases totally fail the WP:GNG for a lack of third-party sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 07:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.