Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley burroughs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No Consensus. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 17:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly fails WP:BIO. Cool BlueLight my Fire! 23:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have made some slight improvements; I think he is pretty notable, as an alternative health pioneer; the problem is finding material on him. (I have also moved the article to Stanley Burroughs.) Brianyoumans 00:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: no view really - but the decision needs making in relation to Master Cleanse. Merging would be an option. BTW, I see that CharlieRebich (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) created the article, and a Charlie Rebich is the US distributor of the Madal Bal maple syrup used in the Burroughs Master Cleanse.[1] If they are the same person, the WP:Conflict of interest guidelines strongly advise that they avoid directly editing either article or taking part in this deletion discussion. Tearlach 02:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: No opinion either, but this edit is clearly a POV push on the part of User:CharlieRebich, wherein he wiped out information about a contemporary of Burroughs which was sourced from a reputable publication, along with the citation itself. Also during that edit, User:CharlieRebich inserted unsourced information about the aforementioned maple syrup. I am simply flagging this as a potential issue moving forward.BFD1 02:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and the only question is which way. Ai think the product is better known than the man, so would merge this article into it. DGG 05:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, fails WP:BIO. Maybe merge, but that article doesnt quite meet WP:CORP. Arbustoo 07:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.