Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Miller arrest controversy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC) delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Stanley Miller arrest controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article deals with a relatively minor controversial incident that occurred in 2004. Falls under WP:NOTNEWS as it offers no evidence of lasting notability or widespread interest. LordPistachio talk 22:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - time has proven its non-notability. Bearian (talk) 00:24, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - I tried to think of a place that this could be smerged to, but am inclined to agree with user:Bearian above and as per nom. Keristrasza (talk) 15:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Non-notable and probably violates WP:BLP. EnabledDanger (talk) 20:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Fails WP:NOTNEWS and WP:ONEEVENT. ----moreno oso (talk) 04:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - small number of news sources shows this was not an important event. Arrests are routine unless they are heavily reported. Dew Kane (talk) 23:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.