Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanislav Gribkov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stanislav Gribkov[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure if is notable. The only cited source in article is affiliated to the subject, and it's not reliable - in the Russian-language version of that source I didn't found these interesting facts about the subject (500 works... etc) sourced with it. XXN, 15:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 20:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 20:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 20:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- here's a brief bio: Personalities of St Petersburg, showing a long and distinguished career, as in:

"the author of numerous choral arrangements, which have become part of the repertoire of many Russian choirs."

Another brief profile, from the Saint Petersburg Philharmonic Orchestra web site: link.

Probably passes WP:NARTIST. More sources likely exist in Russian. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:58, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Pretty sure it is notable. Agree that it passes WP:NARTIST and more sources likely exist in Russian. The brief bio diff, shows a distinguished career. - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clears NARTIST, per coffman too. Lourdes 08:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.