Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Flibbertigibbets (talk) 13:11, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Stan London

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Stan London (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was tagged for notability in 2020. As I am looking for sources, I am finding that every major professional team has/had physicians on staff, there are some surgeons that have drawn national attention. There are obituaries for London including a memorial or testimonial from his employer https://www.stlshof.com/dr-stan-london/ Beyond the entry being a memorial "WP:MEMORIAL" or WP is not a memorial; there is no indicator, to me as a matter of opinion, that the subject is notable in any way. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
• Comment I would say that this is definitely significant coverage that goes towards passing GNG but more is needed. I think it would be wise to look him up on Newspapers.com. There are some hits there on him but I don't have my access there right now, so I don't know if they are significant coverage. Alvaldi (talk) 10:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

  I checked the source provided and it was an "obit" Wikipedia:Obituaries as sources <-I am a new editor so I cannot make a judgement other than to say that is a eulogy. 99% of the articles are obituaries.

  My analysis (opinion) was based on "comparison" to other sports doctors. There are some really notable team doctors (mostly surgeons), most not.

  I did find this;

  https://www.upi.com/Archives/1990/10/30/London-named-team-physician-for-All-Star-tour-of-Japan/4905657262800/

  But then again, I would say it was just part of his job function (not a differentiator) Flibbertigibbets (talk) 01:22, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

• Obituaries written by family members or friends would constitute as a primary source. In this case, the source is written by a reporter and published in the sport section of the publication, something that is normaly reserved for individuals that gained some notability through their career, so it is a secondary source that is independent of the subject. While the upi.com source does mention him, it only does so briefly and thus shouldn't be considered a significant source. Alvaldi (talk) 11:34, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

• Keep after digging around on Newspapers.com, I found several sources that establish that he has the significant coverage dating from the 1940's from both his athletic and medical career to pass WP:GNG, including [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Alvaldi (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

  Thanks.. for your insight; and updating the article. I am going to close the deletion. Flibbertigibbets (talk)

13:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.