Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stalked at 17

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stalked at 17[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television film, lacking significant coverage and other indications of notability per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 00:08, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NFILM. Article has been uncited for years, and from my research I have not found any reliable sources to help fix that. The coverage for this film is limited to database entries, tv listings and similar, insignificant passing mentions. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 14:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG/NFILM. Nothing notable found. Kolma8 (talk) 05:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.