Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StagTV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

StagTV[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable student TV station. I had made a redirect, which was challenged--but article improvement, such as it was, gives me no reason to think this is notable per GNG. Drmies (talk) 20:32, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The student tv station in the UK with the most subscribers, with 4 technical awards from the national body, and that has featured in mainstream national newspapers, isn’t notable? If we were to go with your ridiculous opinion, we wouldn’t have any articles on student TV stations at all, because your notability requirements are too high for any of them to reach. Tropzax (talk) 21:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:58, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:58, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is not much in the way of coverage at all. Nothing in Gbooks or news either. Fails WP:SIGCOV scope_creep (talk) 22:14, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I want to know why Drmies has a hatred for this page - the article for the American student TV station StagsTV has zero citations and lots of useless parts, but that’s not been nominated for deletion. Tropzax (talk) 12:22, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at Wikipedia:Other stuff exists, its unlikely that Drmies has a hatred. Don't take it personally. As the article stands at the moment, it appears the channel received some passing attention by the Daily Mail and Express. At the moment, most sources are the station website, if you can show further coverage in the media that would be a good start. --Aloneinthewild (talk) 12:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - if CAPTAIN RAJU or Tropzax think that this station is notable, then please show some real sources. Both the daily mail and express sources talk about the station in passing and the real subject is the YouTube video (and while both sources are used, they are for the same exact story). And regarding the 4 technical awards from the national body - that organization has 40-something stations. Winning an award from something like that is very non-notable. --Gonnym (talk) 10:27, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. the refs don't sufficiently indicate notability. Szzuk (talk) 14:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.