Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stafford Tavares

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stafford Tavares

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a professional doesn't make someone inherently notable and there's no Google News results for this person. Despite having place in some academic papers, there does not appear to be evidence of GENERAL notability. Graywalls (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. News coverage is largely irrelevant for academics; we have WP:PROF instead. His heavily cited publications (nine with over 100 citations on Google Scholar [1]) give him a clear pass of WP:PROF#C1. And his election as an IACR Fellow also gives him a pass of #C3. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Per evaluation of @David Eppstein:. Dwaro (talk) 18:40, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:PROF#C1 and WP:PROF#C3.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:37, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes multiple WP:PROF criteria. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:12, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.