Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staffan Lindeberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 00:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Staffan Lindeberg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person Alexbrn (talk) 12:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Lindeberg's death last year caused a number of obituaries, both internationally and locally in Sweden. I'm posting links to sample of them here, hoping they might be useful for determining his notability. The first three links are in English, the remaining in Swedish. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] /FredrikT (talk) 09:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first four are blog postings from people in the paleo community. the 2nd two are from the local paper; the first is kind of obituary-y while the second is more a blog posting reminisce. Jytdog (talk) 16:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth link is hardly just to some individual within the paleo community. It's an article in an online magazine about diabetes, edited by a physician and teacher at the university hospital of the University of Gothenburg. /FredrikT (talk) 12:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails GNG. Jytdog (talk) 16:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. probably meets WP:PROF as an expert in his field, on the basis of a widely held general bnok he wrote, published by Wiley, a very important mainstream academic publisher. [7]. DGG ( talk ) 02:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to pass both WP:PROF#C1 (eight publications with >100 citations on Google scholar) and WP:GNG (the Swedish-language obituaries posted above by FredrikT; I agree with Jytdog that the English ones aren't worth much.) —David Eppstein (talk) 05:43, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.