Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stade Jules-Ladoumègue (Romorantin-Lanthenay)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to SO Romorantin. ✗plicit 06:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stade Jules-Ladoumègue (Romorantin-Lanthenay)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No indication of notability. The football club that plays here has always been amateur. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The amateur status of the team has nothing to do with the stadium. The French version of the article suggests that there has been some coverage of the stadium, mostly in French of course. Our article simply needs improving, not deleting. BigDom (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @BigDom: the fact that the team has always been amateur does matter because of this. And I don't see WP:GNG being met. Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Paul Vaurie: Fair enough, wasn't aware of that guideline - I just knew we didn't have any specific stadium notability guidelines tied to professional/amateur status in the Football WikiProject. Obviously GNG being met is always a bit subjective and this case is a little borderline. I wouldn't object too strongly to GiantSnowman's suggestion below of a redirect to the club page for now. BigDom (talk) 13:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to parent article - SO Romorantin - as possible search term. Giant Snowman 20:51, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to parent article - SO Romorantin per GS.--Ortizesp (talk) 04:23, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - as per User:GiantSnowman Ingratis (talk) 00:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.