Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacks Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. See WP:NPASR. Kurykh (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stacks Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This textbook appears to fail WP:GNG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 05:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not every textbook is notable enough, but I would say this one is notable enough. Éléments de géométrie algébrique is clearly notable and, as I understand, the book is supposed to be a modern substitute of that (and SGA); in fact, it's already being cited where the citations to EGA, SGA would be more typical traditionally. -- Taku (talk) 21:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
...is supposed to be a modern substitute of that... would be a WP:INHERITED argument. (No opinion on the rest of the merits.) Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker ^talk 05:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.