Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Thomas Orthodox Church, Nellippoyil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

St. Thomas Orthodox Church, Nellippoyil[edit]

St. Thomas Orthodox Church, Nellippoyil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a small individual church of the Malabar Diocese of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church. This individual church does not have any web presence, all links both in the article and that I found searching were for the parent Malankara Church, and this church has no notability as a separate entity from it. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete perhaps if there's nothing suggesting solidity for its own article. Notifying DGG for subject analysis. SwisterTwister talk 08:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. We have never considered individual churches notable as a matter of course DGG ( talk ) 22:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No claim of notability. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.