Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Paul Higher Secondary School, Indore (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

St. Paul Higher Secondary School, Indore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article that has been nominated twice before and both times the result has been keep. Not a single source listed in the article is related to the subject nor establishes any information about this school. This clearly fails GNG. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Has the consensus the closer cited in the most previous AfD fallen out of favor? Curbon7 (talk) 18:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES links us to a Feb 2017 RfC where consensus on such schools did change so that we can now say "Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist." Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the school certainly exists. I can find notable or near-notable people cited as attending the school, and the documented visit by Mother Teresa and Journal of Marriage and Family paper are also small little snippets or breadcrumbs. None of this amounts to SIGCOV or GNG, and I was unable to find any depth of coverage. tedder (talk) 22:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The two references in the article do not directly relate to the school and I can't find any sources that do. So this clearly fails the notability guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.Advait (talk) 10:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.