Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Paul's Church, Koodal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:58, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

St. Paul's Church, Koodal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

St. Paul's Church, Koodal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails GNG and CONG. I did some research and the only thing I could find is this and this which shows that it is a real place but no indication that its notable. `~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 03:55, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Religion, and India. `~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 03:55, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:14, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fairly typical self-promo and not much info found. ~ 18:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.