Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Mary's Orthodox Cathedral, Pazhanji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 20:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

St. Mary's Orthodox Cathedral, Pazhanji

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While we do have a function as WP:Gazetteer, we require the place to have inherent notability. My WP:BEFORE has not revealed any. Fails WP:GNG 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Religion, Geography, and India. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Cathedrals are generally the subject of multiple reliable sources, but some of these sources may be unavailable online. On that principle, I would keep this article. This search on Google News also helps. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to cathedrals generally being notable, this one is 500 years old and covered in Onmanorama, the Deccan Chronicle and The Hindu. Mccapra (talk) 04:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets general notability as a cathedral. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 15:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per commenters above. Can be tagged for development. IMO probably all cathedrals are individually notable; at worst a cathedral might only be covered as a list-item in List of cathedrals (and then some coverage with sources should be provided at list-item, and the name should be a redirect, with suitable categories, to anchor at its list-item). Note, however, that List of cathedrals in India, which is organized by denomination and includes this one, has no details about any of its items. Many are blacklinks or redlinks. So merging info about this one cathedral to that list-article would appear to be undue coverage, so again it seems better to "Keep".--Doncram (talk) 03:30, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Cathedrals are generally notable without more. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Cathedrals are inherently notable! -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per multiple reliable sources. MOSC cathedrals are inherently notable. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.