Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Leo Catholic Elementary School, Mimico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator, as per this edit. I'll process the closure - redirects to the articles themselves may be performed as needed, subject to the usual policies. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

St. Leo Catholic Elementary School, Mimico

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stumbled upon this article while recent changes patrolling; non-notable elementary school; {{Refimprove}} placed six years ago; article only cites one source. Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, most elementary schools are non-notable. Esquivalience ^t 01:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also nominate the following articles based on a category search:

delete - non-notable schools unless there is a notable person who attended with sources. I cannot locate any for these articles. DangerDogWest (talk) 06:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - the common practice from both outcomes and school article guidelines is not deletion, but redirect. This could have been boldly done without coming to AfD. I would propose the proper outcome here would be to redirect the parochial schools to the appropriate diocese, and the public schools to the school district. We may not do articles on primary and intermediate schools, but people will still search for them. That's why we redirect as opposed to delete. --John from Idegon (talk) 08:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all- the common practice from both outcomes and school article guidelines is not deletion, but redirect as demonstrated by over 2,000 redirects. . This could have been boldly done without coming to AfD. I would propose the proper outcome here would be to redirect the parochial schools to the appropriate diocese, and the public schools to the school district. We may not do articles on primary and intermediate schools, but people will still search for them. That's why we redirect as opposed to delete. NOTE: Listing these articles in the face of the common knowledge of the customary prqctice ios sisruptive. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.