Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. James Church (Marion, Indiana)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 01:56, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

St. James Church (Marion, Indiana)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a thoroughly average church. One wedding for famous people doesn't make a church notable. Nyttend (talk) 23:13, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any coverage of the church that isn't trivial or entirely about the wedding, and notability is not inherited from the wedding. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 10:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - I'm not even sure it passes my failry lax standards. Assuming the blissful couple could be considered notable congregants, that's one factor. It appears to be fairly large for Missouri Synod congregations. However, it's not on any register of historic sites, nor has anything else of note happened there. Bearian (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.