Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Städtholdengrad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 02:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Städtholdengrad

It's not clear whether Städtholdengrad is real or fictional Mblumber (talk) 01:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm finding zero non-WP g-hits for this term. [1] There should at least be something. Oakshade (talk) 01:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(Amended Vote) Multiple Delete - Scores zero google hits, zero de.Yahoo hits, nothing shows anywhere else. May very well be a WP:HOAX or fall under CSD - G1 (Nonsense) even. Nothing on any of these outside WP at all. Bin the lot!--Thor Malmjursson (talk) 10:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:V, not to mention WP:N. Possible hoax. Nsk92 (talk) 01:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Also, add the following articles, all created by the same person and which seem related:
- Hub world (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Senator Artermerun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- "Samara-EAL" (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Etheric Global Communication Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

-- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ - per above, seems like a hoax. Green caterpillar (talk) 02:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, delete all 5. Green caterpillar (talk) 15:44, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Nonsense / hoax. (Or is it some in-universe game cruft?) — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all five, whether hoax or cruft. JohnCD (talk) 07:40, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Seems like parts of a story that is just being WP:MADEUP, no real world significance asserted or to be found.
It has legible conent and is no blatant hoax, so it's not a candidate for speedy deletion, FWIW.
Amalthea^Talk 20:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.