Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srinagar–Kargil–Leh line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Srinagar–Kargil–Leh line

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Perhaps the page was created on a mere announcement backed by an archived single source which said "survey will be conducted in 2013-14". The line is non-existent as well as that survey which never took place. MehrajMir (talk) 13:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 14:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 14:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment At present, Srinagar–Kargil–Leh is connected by road and there is definitely a proposal to create a rail line linking them. It seems it was initially announced in 2013 [1] The strategic lines include the Srinagar-Kargil-Leh railway line. A reference frm 2014 says [2] Some of the important new lines the Defence Ministry has proposed include Srinagar-Kargil-Leh. A more recent reference is [3] it says Separately, the government is also planning to connect Leh with Srinagar. This proposed railway line will pass through Zoji La and Kargil while connecting the Kashmir Valley to the northernmost part of the country.. An opinion in 2017 [4] references it as well. The most recent I found is 2018 [5] which says The decks are being cleared to build two types of railway links for Leh – Bilaspur-Manali-Leh and Srinagar-Kargil-Leh. It is seems like the project is in the pipeline. I will search for more sources.--DreamLinker (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A mere proposal does not establish notability of an article. MehrajMir (talk) 13:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 16:57, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails GNG; no substantial coverage. --K.e.coffman (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Not even a harmonica man on the platform. -The Gnome (talk) 13:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.