Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Sumarni (politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  08:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Sumarni (politician)[edit]

Sri Sumarni (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is written by a now permanently blocked sockpuppet member of a paid editing ring. I think it should be speedily deleted, but my speedy was declined. A regency is a second order subdivision in Indonesia, roughly corresponding to a country in the US. Governors of states and similar first order subdivisions are assumed to be worth articles, but not county executives, even if their title is translated as "governor" . There is no evidence for notability otherwise. DGG ( talk ) 06:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:50, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:50, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:50, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete if we want to preserve Wikipedia as what we intend it to be, we need to proactively remove articles created by those who are trying to twist it into being a modern who's who type pay to get in scheme where they add insult to injury by being the ones who collect the payment.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. When I first edited the article, I thought that regents were assumed to be notable, but it turns out that they are not. I can't find enough reliable sources. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 06:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per the above arguments. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Being a regent is not a notable post. Paid-editing should never be accepted. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 14:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.