Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Laxmi Janta High School, Madhwapur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 08:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Laxmi Janta High School, Madhwapur[edit]

Sri Laxmi Janta High School, Madhwapur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable school. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I think the "in-depth" requirement needs to be eliminated for schools in India. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 05:10, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What we think, as sensible as it might may be at times, is not relevant as long as it's not included in the policies and agreed upon. The number of schools India has, I think the rules should be better structured. But like I said, irrelevant till it becomes a policy. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Schools, anywhere, are not normally notable, as I see nothing that makes this school notable. --Bduke (talk) 01:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as per nom, fails WP:GNG. Eastmain's point is well-taken, and for years that was actually a valid argument on AfD (as per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES), however, after an RFC a year or two ago, that is no longer the case. Onel5969 TT me 00:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.