Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Karunamayi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The arguments for retention seem to outweigh the arguments for deletion given. –MuZemike 22:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sri Karunamayi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spam. Wasabi Attack (talk) 19:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Seems to pass WP:BIO. Needs improvement of course, but that's beside the point.TheRingess (talk) 19:36, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Can not find anything in Google news. Also, the opening sentence claiming she is known world-wise reads more like self-promotion and self-indulgence, rahter than based on anything factual. Especially since there are no news articles concerning her. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 19:57, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Can't find any sources. Fails WP:BIO. Joe Chill (talk) 22:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Changed to keep: Per Whpq. Joe Chill (talk) 02:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Google News has many articles behind pay walls. But this Columbus Dispatch article is available for free view and is a substantial writeup about her. She is also covered in Holy people of the world: a cross-cultural encyclopedia, Volume 3. -- Whpq (talk) 16:23, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.