Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sreejith Guruvayur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sreejith Guruvayur[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A makeup artist with no evidence of notability and fails WP:GNG. Also the article does not have a single reliable source. Onmyway22 talk 16:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Onmyway22 talk 16:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onmyway22 talk 16:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Onmyway22 talk 16:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Onmyway22 talk 16:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no sig coverage. Behind the moors (talk) 11:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onmyway22 talk 20:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not pass WP:GNG- this article has one source which when you open says,'Page not found'. insignificant coverage and literally lacks reference to other secondary sources, which puts its notability in question.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.