Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sree Narayana Training College

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 11:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sree Narayana Training College[edit]

Sree Narayana Training College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources found do not meet WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:ORGIND and ultimately WP:NORG is not met. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock, see here, user was renamed. -- Beccaynr (talk) 15:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. A staff of 20. There are a number of these Indian articles in existence and they're going to need TNT/cleanup or some policy revision to be allowed, IMHO. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete: per nom. Fails NSCHOOL. Non-notable school. Kolma8 (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The only source in the article is primary, it's written like an advert, they don't seem to award degrees, and from a BEFORE there's just a few trivial names drops about in articles on other stuff. So I don't see a valid reason to keep this. The staff of 20 is a huge tell also that this isn't notable. Wikipedia isn't a business directory and not every tiny educational institution deserve an article "just because." --Adamant1 (talk) 16:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.