Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sree Narayana Public School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 15:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sree Narayana Public School[edit]

Sree Narayana Public School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NSCHOOL. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC) strike per WP:SOCKSTRIKE and this. -- Beccaynr (talk) 06:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per nom. Fails NSCHOOL. Kolma8 (talk) 16:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheChronium 17:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Lacks indepth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Impeeriumalo (talk) 12:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural keep as nom is a sock. Feel free to renominate to the AFD. VV 15:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Since other non-sock editors have !voted delete, a procedural keep shouldn't be necessary. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:34, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.