Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sree Narayana College, Kollam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 22:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sree Narayana College, Kollam[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia needs to stop being an annotated internet guide. If we cannot produce even one independent source we need to not have an article. Subject completely fails WP: NSCHOOL. Nothing even close to the depth of coverage required to pass WP:NORG, therefore, there is simply no alternative but to delete. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock, see here, user was renamed. --Blablubbs|talk 11:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I totally agree with the nominator. All I could find is a few trivial name drops in school directories and articles about stuff. Nothing that address the subject of the article directly or in-depth though. So this clearly fails WP:NORG or from what I can tell even WP:GNG. Wikipedia isn't a business directory. All that said, the one thing this might have going for it is the notable alumni, but a good portion of them seem to have extremely sketchy notability themselves and I don't think an article just made out of a notable alumni section is worth keeping. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage. Peter303x (talk) 06:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.