Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squiz (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Squiz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is largely promotional in nature and lacks references. I've looked about for references and am not finding anything beyond the usual press releases. Company and software appears to me to be non-notable. Nuujinn (talk) 21:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The references that are RS are not lengthy, in-depth and do not demonstrate notability. Miami33139 (talk) 21:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unambiguous advertising: was founded.... with the aim of providing new levels of control, flexibility and efficiency in enterprise online publishing and web content management. They are, in other words, yet another commercial web host, one among hundreds of thousands, and this article makes absolutely no case that this one is particularly significant. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 21:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The company is a successful Australian software developer. The refs are relevant. Some of the clients mentioned in the refs are eminently notable. These are non-trivial mentions by independent 3rd parties/ leading Australian newspapers. It needs an edit to read less like an advertisement but this is a problem common to virtually every software company on WP.AWHS (talk) 17:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have substantially rewritten this article and added 5 notable references.AWHS (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.