Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Square-Enix console

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Square-Enix console[edit]

Mostly speculation. Although it's certainly a reasonable guess, there is no confirmation that the "thing" that Square Enix and Taito are collaborating on is a console, especially a seventh generation one. That the product will be a console, though a reasonable conclusion, is original research. Please note that the logo in the article is "unofficial," which in this context is pretty much another word for "fake." Maxamegalon2000 12:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Porqin 12:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Porqin.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If you've read any of the articles about this project, there's no evidence whatsoever that it will be a console, making this purely speculative. - Thorne N. Melcher 16:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 18:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, crystal-balling. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 19:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sadly. It'd be a facinanting article, but it's way too early for it. Not enough press relese yet, to qualify for the loopholes in Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Thanatosimii 20:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing substantial enough to avoid crystal-balling. RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 22:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but preserve content somewhere (like Talk:Square Enix). It may become useful if the theory pans out. Kill the image - it's groundless speculation, giving a title for a system whose very existence is unconfirmed. Deco 22:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article is all based on rumors and hearsay.guitarhero777777 16:02, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is pure speculation. Ace of Sevens 22:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The author also spelled the name wrong(it's Square Enix, not Square-Enix). TJ Spyke 06:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per above --Peephole 16:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -Sean Curtin 21:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.