Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spireon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 23:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spireon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources here don't meet WP:CORPDEPTH as they are either press releases or primary sources. The award they won at CES 2014 is a possible claim to notability but I can't find any sources that are not press releases from the company and so I'm not sure it is a notable award (even though the event is notable).

External links to the company have been spammed to other Wikipedia articles recently[1], which is always a bit of a red flag as well. bonadea contributions talk 14:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as I found links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam but nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 23:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pure PR blather unskillfully written. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.