Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spinnin' Premium (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Spinnin' Records. Sandstein 07:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spinnin' Premium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. Lack of significant coverage. — Zawl 10:13, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 13:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 13:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - all references are effectively press releases for the subject's initial release. Note all contain the same quote from the subject's founder. Nothing shows that the subject has received any significant independent coverage.--Rpclod (talk) 16:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - I don't see how the topic differs from Spinnin' Records. Are there different artists signed? Is its management independent of the parent company? If the music different from Spinnin' in genre or otherwise? The answer seems to be "no" for all of these, so I think having separate articles is a dis-service to readers as confusing. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.