Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spinnerball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spinnerball

This is a disguised advertisement. The link takes you to www.spinnerball.com, where Fun Outdoor Games LLC would like to sell you the Spinnerball^TM game for $49.95, or 12 for $299.40 etc. JohnCD (talk) 20:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No assertion of notability. No reliable, verifiable, or independent sources. DarkAudit (talk) 20:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Maybe not that blatant, but still pretty obvious that it's advertising. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Luk suh 21:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not quite a G11, but it's definitely spammy. Author is SPA whose only other contribution has been to put this article as a "see also" on Lawn game which suggests a posible COI though this is by no means proven. Oh, and did I mention that there are no independent sources, or suggestions of notability? No? Well, there aren't. OlenWhitaker • ^{talk to me} or _don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 22:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some of this (including the "elusive" list) is copied from Ladder ball, which is probably in serious danger of being nominated next, unless it can clean up its own spammy nature. I'm afraid that the author of the Spinnerball article may have inadvertently betrayed that article as well. Mandsford (talk) 14:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes they have. DarkAudit (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Non-notable and advertisement. Percy Snoodle (talk) 12:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it's a advertisement. (What's a scoring bar,anyway?) 99.230.152.143 (talk) 23:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. As entioned above, this is just basically a (partial) repeat of Ladder ball. --Craw-daddy | T | 12:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.