Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Kuvin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. JForget 20:07, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spencer Kuvin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable biography. Admittedly, most GNews hits are behind paywalls, but judging by the snippets and the few that were freely viewable the articles are mostly on the legal cases themselves, not the lawyer himself, thus he lacks the significant coverage necessary to merit an article. Cybercobra (talk) 20:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Mr. Kuvin is mentioned is about 70 news stories. As noted by the nom, the stories are mostly about cases he was the lawyer for. However, it is my opinion that part of notable cases makes a lawyer notable. A possible alternative to deletion, would be to rework the article to be about the law firm he partners (Leopold~Kuvin) rather than Mr. Kuvin himself. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 21:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep notable per cases.--Judo112 (talk) 13:15, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.