Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spells (album) (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Spells (album)[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Spells (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can find no coverage for this album, does not meet WP:NALBUMS or WP:GNG J04n(talk page) 08:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 08:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete': I can't find significant coverage for this album. Joe Chill (talk) 17:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This self-released cassette appears to have zero coverage; does not pass WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow Talk 18:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I will have to agree. Unable to find any third-party coverage despite a variety of targeted Google searches. A mention of the self-release in the artist's article will suffice. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable self-released work by an apparently notable artist; fails WP:NALBUMS. Cocytus [»talk«] 23:54, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.