Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speed Records (Record Label)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speed Records (Record Label)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally proposed for deletion by Ravensfire with the reason: "Draft article exists already at Draft:Speed Records (record label), which is where this should be located, but I don't want to move to the draft with wrong caps. See the history at Speed_Records_(record_label) (the right capitalization)." FASTILY 01:31, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the original draft (with correct caps) is in far better shape and is where work should focus. At best, this should be a redirect to the original draft. This article has seen some significant pushing, probably COI / UDP editing, but I think this latest draft is a good faith effort but needs to be pointed to the right article to develop. Ravensfire (talk) 02:02, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The sourcing here is better and arguably sufficient from reputable sources but I've transferred the sources here to the draft anyway. Its good to see initative of bypassing AfC anyway.Djm-leighpark (talk) 03:58, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - neither of the references are about Speed Records itself - label has no notable artists or releases - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRITE - no "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources" - no "significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education" - therefore, Delete – Epinoia (talk) 00:56, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~unreferenced~~ stub about non-notable subject. Lubbad85 (☎) 22:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how unreferenced stub it an accurate statement. The article clearly has references. You may be saying there are no WP:RS references but that is not what is stated. Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to find any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.