Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpeedFan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SpeedFan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of WP:notability Only one independent source and that is not significant coverage. Google searches not finding anything significant despite initially showing 2.5m hits they disappear after around 300 hits. noq (talk) 19:48, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are reliable sources. Majorgeeks, Softpedia, C|Net, Silent PC review and PCWorld all had reviews done by members of their staff. It is also a very common program to use with other monitoring programs, such as Nagios, XBMC and Rainmeter. Bgwhite (talk) 17:19, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Bgwhite. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Bgwhite -Halo (talk) 17:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.