Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spedpod
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete. Tiptoety talk 23:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Spedpod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unused protologism, no hits. Fails WP:RS, and WP:V. Asenine 19:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete; WP:NEO. --KurtRaschke (talk) 19:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - Cannot be speedied, does not fit into any available category. I would have otherwise. Asenine 19:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note - Agreed, the CSD are exceedingly rigid and lead to a lot of jumping through hoops just to get rid of bad pages, but this AfD should still be a candidate for early closure. --KurtRaschke (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - Cannot be speedied, does not fit into any available category. I would have otherwise. Asenine 19:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as spam. Though ghits] shows some links about this entry in different name, but most of them are blog. No indication of notability--NAHID 19:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Bstone (talk) 19:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, non-notable neologism if I ever saw one. JIP | Talk 20:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, no refs and difficult to obtain, no indication of notability and possible advertisement. ~AH1(TCU) 21:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.