Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specter (Ape Escape)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I would normally close an AFD like this as merge or no consensus, but the article is completely bereft of sources which would be required in the merge target. Stifle (talk) 09:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Specter (Ape Escape) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of the video game series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 22:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge into Ape Escape (series). Again, purely a rehash of the plot. Nifboy (talk) 23:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BJTalk 00:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep or merge The information is needed somewhere. He is apparently the key character for the various games, and it might be clearer to keep it separate. There is however a main article that would do for the merge. I doubt all the plot detail is needed, but that's an editing question. No reason given to delete rather than mergeDGG (talk) 00:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Article contains mainly original research and unverifiable plot summaries (hence the {{inuniverse}} tag). MuZemike (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge non-redundant content to characters list. - A Link to the Past (talk) 16:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Plot summary and in-universe detail with no real-world information. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject indicates that this topic is non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 06:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.