Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speak (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Cirt (talk) 05:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speak (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sufficiently notable--not enough coverage —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:37, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Just enough coverage in my view.--Michig (talk) 16:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - agree w/Michig. There doesn't appear to be an abundance of coverage, but enough exists such that subject satisfies criterion 1 of WP:BAND. Gongshow ^Talk 16:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 19:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Coverage is sufficient to pass WP:BAND (criterion #1).Contains Mild Peril (talk) 00:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.