Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spam fritter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Spam fritter[edit]
Nonnotable recipe, unsourced and probably unverifiable. Deprodded by author. NawlinWiki 14:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The afd flag was removed by the same ip address. I haven't done anything further as I'm not sure if it should be reverted back, or a new templated added again. Marasmusine 14:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Reverted back to AFD template; if users want to readd their edits to body of article, they can. NawlinWiki 14:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any reason why this article should be deleted. As another user has noted on the article's talk page, it is just as valid as Apple Pie and many other things. The article is certainly of a low quality and should be improved, but it is not (referencing the above) (a) a recipe, nonnotable or otherwise, (b) unsourced - that can be fixed, or (c) probably unverifiable, see (b).
- Nothing worth keeping. Redirect to Spam (food). Angela. 15:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Spam (food). Notable only as a use of spam, not in itself. And it should mention the World War 2 association really. Bwithh 16:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Of course the article needs improvement, but its topic seems to be a real food, and the Wikipedia food section is full of similar articles about foodstuffs that are local favorites in various parts of the world. Speaking of Spam in particular, there's another article about spam musubi, for instance. Or would you like some deep-fried pizza instead? Dr.frog 00:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.