Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Industrial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Space Industrial

Neologism attempt... non existant genre.

Similar to the "post goth" situation... WP:SPAM promoting the same "Glass Project" band.. promoted by the same spammer(s). Deathrocker 11:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. Additionally, this is an essay based on original research and thus non-wikipedia (see WP:NOT). Docether 14:37, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• speedy delete fails WP:MUSIC as did Gothitech, urban goth, whisper core, vampire rock, post goth... Dominick ^(TALK) 14:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per above. Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:NOR, WP:SPAM... -- Kicking222 15:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Another article where different ideas are somehow supposed to be connected. I'm beginning to think that there are more invented genres for music than there are bands. Kevin 01:56, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as per Kicking222. RandyWang (^raves/_rants) 05:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Note - the Spammer has just re-created the article under "Space Industrial Culture". - Deathrocker 05:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Original research, not verified, unnotable --Adrift* 12:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. IrishGuy 17:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Do you really think that knowledge will always stay the same? What do you mean by non-wikipedia? If I am signed up as a member of WIKI...doesn't that make me a wikipedian? The authoritative structure of this website I might add seems to be run by trolls and gnomes...the endless list of people that make small or large changes to knowledge that is seen. Kevin in response to your comment-how much of what you consider real knowledge actually is untrue...what about the pages of history? How much is verifiable truth? What really is notable...as the very things to what people adhere to could very well be lies. Have you noticed in "google land" that mispelled words appear right along side of correctly spelled words? How much information on the net is regurgitated? Deathrocker...in your response to "spammer" there is no need in attacking me-it only makes yourself look bad..and the same for Adrift. If space industrial culture is not accecpted in as a musical genera, perhaps it will be accepted as a sub-culture in it's own article. We are peaceful people seeking to make aware new culture...I have not even been offered assistance by any of you in maybe helping to write an article about these subjects. Instead...attacks. Does that give a good name for trolls and gnomes? As you may or may not know, space industrial aside, It is the conduct of gnomes and trolls that is the greatest concern here. The reputation of gnomes that I have gathered so far is that Deathrocker is an outspoken gnome and has a mindset in his brain to what history of certian musical generas are. He also may have an issue with myspace as a verifiable source, or one that notes credibility...Myspace has become the standard for the underground and the mainstream worlds. Just like Bill Gates creating Windows...Tom maybe be on the verge of a monopoly...Look at X space for example...An X men myspace..modeling the myspace sucess...Will someone like to help me write a WIKI article about new cultures? -Keodrah

First off, personal attacks (like calling people trolls and gnomes) are against Wiki policy. Second, indeed MySpace is not a verifiable source. As absolutely anyone with computer access can create a MySpace page, it is therefore proof of nothing more than internet access and some spare time. It certainly doesn't illustrate a "movement" or a "genre" just because someone has a MySpace page. IrishGuy 17:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Keodrah sez : "Look at X space for example...An X men myspace..modeling the myspace sucess...Will someone like to help me write a WIKI article about new cultures?" Or, better yet, a NewCultureWiki, where essay-style speculative articles like the one under discussion are acceptable. Unfortunately, this is Wikipedia, and they aren't. Docether 14:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete personal essay - original research Tom Harrison ^Talk 00:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.