Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soxman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 May 29. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Soxman[edit]
- Soxman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. No hint of notability. A Google search related to him only comes up with this Wikipedia article and his Myspace page. Articles referencing him (all from the same site, thesportsbank.net) were helped written by him and the main editor of this page. The main editor of this page, Paul Banks, wrote many of the articles referenced, uploaded the picture here and maintains this page. Bottom line: Attending "several games each year" dressed as a buffoon doesn't warrant a Wikipedia article. Endlessdan (talk) 16:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - for the reasons made clear by the nominator. A Sox fan should expect snow in April anyway. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agreed, there's no independent evidence supporting notability. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 00:54, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.