Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sowmya Rao Nadig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sowmya Rao Nadig[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR, only one significant role, the rest seem fairly minor. Minimal details in the article, just not enough here to keep. Ravensfire (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ravensfire (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ravensfire (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ravensfire (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as she does have some prominent roles, such as in Nenjam Marappathillai (TV series) and in Valli (TV series) where she had a prominent role before leaving the show, also can you explain why you removed the existing references, were they unreliable? thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Atlantic306, correct, neither of those were good sources. One was more wiki / blog and they were both just click-bait sites. The sources that remain and the linked articles for the shows don't show anythign about prominence except for the one. That's not enough to meet WP:NACTOR. We can't just say there's enough, there has to actually be enough in the article. Ravensfire (talk) 17:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:12, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.