Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southend Borough Combination
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I accept there is some local coverage, but given that it looks mainly unattributed, I doubt it is either significant or wholly independent from the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Southend Borough Combination (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This league is played between levels 17 and 21 of the English league system and the Premier Division of this league, therefore, sits 6 places below the level where it would have inherent notability (level 11). It therefore needs to demonstrate WP:GNG. I found nothing on ProQuest and a newspaper search showed that the results were listed in the Chelmsford Chronicle from time to time. The Yellow Advertiser does occasionally list results for the league here. I am yet to find even one instance of actual WP:SIGCOV. Spiderone 12:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 12:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The Gazette provides regular coverage of the league – full write-ups rather than simply a list of results. Number 57 20:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.