Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southeast Asia Imperial & Royal League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Wafulz 21:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Southeast Asia Imperial & Royal League[edit]

I think this page should be kept. It is about a verifiable (if not fashionable) political body, links to other appropriate articles, and documents a real cultural group about which Americans probably know little. I'm not really sure why it was included for deletion? Markwiki 20:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete no supporting only copies via googleBnguyen 19:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This AfD nomination appears to have never been listed properly. It is listed now – Qxz 01:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unless verification can be shown. Even so, may not be notable. Realkyhick 06:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep about as informative as a stub gets, about a major organisation all of whose members are notable. Not sure where Bnguyen gets the "only copies via google" from; leaving out Wikipedia & answers.com I get 292,000 Google hits[1] including prominent mentions on the official websites of all the relevant royal families. - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you search for the exact term, you get only 8+5 results[2][3]. utcursch | talk 12:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per Iridescenti --DorisHノート 20:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nomination - the subject is not suitable for wikipedia until some kind of verification can be found. Mr. Berry 23:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mr.Berry Captain panda In vino veritas 00:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Artaxiad 21:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What exactly do they do? What is the agreement they signed? For all we can glean from the article and the lack of reliable sources, they meet to compare crowns and make Yul Brenner jokes. Caknuck 17:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.