Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Asia Institute of Advanced Christian Studies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

South Asia Institute of Advanced Christian Studies[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:TNT. I don't doubt that probably a decent article could be written about SAIACS, but the article in its current state ain't it. The current article borders on qualifying for WP:G11, since it is written in a promotional tone and would need to be rewritten to be encyclopaedic. I have tried to look for a clean version in its history, but couldn't find anything salvageable. $Salvio$ 09:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:04, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:04, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SAIACS is a prominent seminary in India. No need to delete this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.186.67.132 (talk) 00:57, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to meet WP:GNG. AfD is for deletion not cleanup and even the proposer appears to think the topic is notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, trimming the promo material wouldn't be very difficult. Jahaza (talk) 04:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Don't see issue with notability. Lorstaking (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the nominator does not doubt the notability of the topic but is nominating on the basis of the tone of the article being advertorial but that can be addressed by a rewrite rather than deletion, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets GNG subject is notable.Saturnrises (talk) 07:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.