Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sousa Dias

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sousa Dias[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find the slightest indication that this person passes WP:GNG or WP:NPROF. Admittedly I'm hampered by being restricted to searching in English only, but I don't see that he would pass any of the NPROF criteria based on the checks I've done. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:37, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:09, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being a professor of philosophy who has published books is not in and of itself enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any reviews of his book. That may be merely because of the language barrier, but without them I don't see a pass of WP:AUTHOR. And similarly, although his book has over 100 citations in Google scholar, it's not by itself enough to pass WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.