Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SourceryForge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. --Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 07:40, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SourceryForge[edit]

NN wiki. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please put more effort into your nominations. "NN" tells us nothing more than "I think this article should be deleted". Try explaining why you think something is non-notable, what steps you have taken to establish this, and so on. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:WEB. Alexa Ranking: 5,132,421 — The Hooded Man ♃♂ 03:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the nominator has not investigated any of these wikis, judging by later nominations, and I have not had time to do so. I agree with JJay that there may be more merit than an Alexa rating may provide. — The Hooded Man ♃♂ 03:19, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep pending further discussion. -- JJay 03:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- 1800 articles, up to a thousand of them "seed" (empty) articles. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree, that is pretty impressive. Is there anything else I should know? -- JJay 09:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Being a wiki does not procure notability. --Apostrophe 04:59, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN wiki. Agnte 13:47, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Notability is not policy, it is just a guideline by which some but by no mean all Wikipedians choose to operate.Jcuk 21:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nn. mikka (t) 23:44, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn wiki --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 06:29, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Fun name. -- Natalinasmpf 16:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.