Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound Money Economics System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 1941 Manitoba general election. $Salvio giuliano$ 19:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sound Money Economics System

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. Seems like a very minor political party that stood a small number of candidates then folded JMWt (talk) 19:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada. JMWt (talk) 19:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: to 1941 Manitoba general election. The party did exist, as I found contemporary sources on newspapers.com, but I don't see any WP:SIGCOV of this very minor party. Curbon7 (talk) 20:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe we should keep it there are many minor parties in wikipedia i will gladly add the election result but the article is a bit bare bones it would help if we could get some more info about it User:Friendlyhistorian — Preceding undated comment added 21:46, 12 March 2023‎ (UTC)
Comment. @Friendlyhistorian: Are you able to provide descriptions of some of the sources that you plan to add (such as hyperlinks or books w/ page numbers)? This would be helpful in evaluating notability. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 14:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am looking for it tbh i am not really good at editing and adding . I usually do minor stuff do you think i could find someone to do it for me Friendlyhistorian (talk) 21:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But for real its insane how obscure this party is Friendlyhistorian (talk) 21:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If it's super obscure, to the point where we don't have sources on it as a party, it might be better to just cover it in the broader context of the election it contested rather than for the party to have its own article. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 1941 Manitoba general election per Curbon7, as a viable ATD. Sal2100 (talk) 19:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 1941 Manitoba general election. Based off of my searching, it appears to fail WP:NGO (it's an obscure subnational political party that we can't find significant coverage for), but it would make sense to target it to the article on the election instead of deleting it. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.