Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soumita Saha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 10:23, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soumita Saha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failing GNG and BAND. While there are some sources, the majority seem based on PR releases or interviews which lack independence from the subject to verify claims. The media covering her seems somewhat local or blog-type with questions about reliability. No indication of e.g. chart success. 10,000 streams as claimed by one source is not really a lot these days. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • STRONG KEEP It will take some time before I am able to come up with more reliable sources. She is a popular singer from Kolkata and is well known in India and Bangladesh. In fact, one of her interviews was published by a leading print newspaper of Bangladesh (here is the screenshot), which in itself speaks of popularity and reinforces notability.
She has been extensively covered by several news sources which are part of Google News. Some of those articles date back to 2014. Here is Google News Search Results about her. Those sources can't be rubbished as tabloid or blogs.
She is a noted Rabindra Sangeet Exponent. If you look at Category Rabindra Sangeet exponents, most articles have similar style, references, media coverage. For e.g. Shreya Guhathakurta, June Banerjee, Mankirt Aulakh etc. If Wikipedia can accept those articles, why should we be partial towards this young singer?
Our purpose is to make Wikipedia more encyclopedic. It takes some time and efforts of large number of editors before an article develops fully. If we keep on deleting stub articles like this, we shall end up harming the very purpose of Wikipedia.
Edit 1- Few editors have questioned her passing WP:N. Here is screenshot of Google Autocomplete which simply reinforces the claim that she is notable in Eastern India and Bangladesh.
Edit 2- I just came across a reference about her in Times of India. Here is the web link and print (epaper) link. This article has only a paragraph (titled More Than Face Value) about her but it definitely reinforces the claim that she passes GNG and NSINGER. Quartzd (talk) 08:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - agree with the nominator that none of the refs convey any notability - some are simply quotes from the subject about other people and some are clearly press releases and promotional material. The assertion that similar articles exist is no argument for retention. We certainly would harm Wikipedia if we retained non-notable articles  Velella  Velella Talk   10:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • For each individual indicator of reliability, there might be exceptions. But when combined, they speak of a significant level of reliability. I have presented sources which are 1. Part of Google News, 2. Which have Wikipedia pages themselves 3.Clippings of Print Newspapers. Together they speak volumes about the WP:RELIABILITY and WP:N Quartzd (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.